This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Hendrick, C. Articles by Slapion-Foote, M. J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Do Men and Women Love Differently?

University of Miami

Susan Hendrick

University of Miami

Franklin H. Foote

University of Miami

Michelle J. Slapion-Foote

University of Miami

This study focused on sex differences in attitudes towards love, within the context of assessing Lee's (1973) theory of love styles, using an instrument adapted from Lasswell & Lasswell (1976). Approximately 800 students at the University of Miami completed a 54-item love attitudes scale as part of a larger attitudes study. The love scale was designed to measure six love styles proposed by Lee: eros, ludus, storge, mania, pragma and agape. Analysis of variance of the item responses showed that males differed significantly from females on 29 of the 54 items. Males tended to be more erotic and ludic in their love attitudes. Females were more pragmatic, storgic and manic in their love attitudes. These results suggested strong sex differences in love attitudes. Results from factor analysis and cluster analysis provided partial support for Lee's theory. The secondary mixture styles of mania, pragma and agape emerged clearly from both types of analyses. The primary styles of eros, ludus and storge also emerged but often in combination with another style. Eros items tended to distribute thematically across the other styles. Factor structure of the scales was roughly comparable for males and females. Results were promising enough to suggest that further scaling work to measure the love attitude styles is warranted.

Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Vol. 1, No. 2, 177-195 (1984)
DOI: 10.1177/0265407584012003


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Duck Silver anniversary essay: A past and a future for relationship research Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, February 1, 2008; 25(1): 189 - 200. [PDF]

				K. Murthy, A. Rotzien, and T. Vacha-Haase Validity Studies Second-Order Structure Underlying the Hendrick-Hendrick Love Attitudes Scale Educational and Psychological Measurement, February 1, 1996; 56(1): 108 - 121. [Abstract]

				M. J. Strube and L. E. Davis Concern about AIDS and Relationship Satisfaction: Correlations with Race and Gender Journal of Adolescent Research, April 1, 1995; 10(2): 227 - 245. [Abstract]

				B. Thompson and G. M. Borrello Measuring Second-Order Factors Using Confirmatory Methods: An Illustration with the Hendrick-Hendrick Love Instrument Educational and Psychological Measurement, March 1, 1992; 52(1): 69 - 77. [Abstract]

				P. A. Frazier and E. Esterly Correlates of Relationship Beliefs: Gender, Relationship Experience and Relationship Satisfaction Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, August 1, 1990; 7(3): 331 - 352. [Abstract]

				J. H. Tolhuizen Communication Strategies for Intensifying Dating Relationships: Identification, Use and Structure Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, November 1, 1989; 6(4): 413 - 434. [Abstract]

				C. Hendrick and S. S. Hendrick Lovers Wear Rose Colored Glasses Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, May 1, 1988; 5(2): 161 - 183. [Abstract]

				B. Thompson and G. M. Borrello Concurrent Validity of a Love Relationships Scale Educational and Psychological Measurement, December 1, 1987; 47(4): 985 - 995. [Abstract]

				P. J. Marston, M. L. Hecht, and T. Robers `True Love Ways': The Subjective Experience and Communication of Romantic Love Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, November 1, 1987; 4(4): 387 - 407. [Abstract]

				S. S. Hendrick and C. Hendrick Love and Sexual Attitudes, Self-Disclosure and Sensation Seeking Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, August 1, 1987; 4(3): 281 - 297. [Abstract]

				K. Dindia and L. A. Baxter Strategies for Maintaining and Repairing Marital Relationships Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, May 1, 1987; 4(2): 143 - 158. [Abstract]

				J. ATKINSON Gender Roles in Marriage and the Family: A Critique and Some Proposals Journal of Family Issues, March 1, 1987; 8(1): 5 - 41. [Abstract]

				L. A. Baxter Gender Differences in the Hetero-Sexual Relationship Rules Embedded in Break-Up Accounts Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, September 1, 1986; 3(3): 289 - 306. [Abstract]

				R. A. Hinde Why do the Sexes Behave Differently in Close Relationships? Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, December 1, 1984; 1(4): 471 - 501.