This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Baxter, L. A. Articles by Widenmann, S. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Revealing and Not Revealing the Status of Romantic Relationships to Social Networks

University of California-Davis

Sally Widenmann

Lewis and Clark College

The researchers conducted retrospective interviews with 101 university-level participants to determine what they did to make their developing romantic relationship known to social network members and what they did to keep their relationship from becoming known. The most frequent topic of both revelation and concealment was information on the relationship's status and progress. Strategic disclosure and manipulation of co-presence signals were the most frequent ways in which information was managed. The most frequent reasons for revelation were felt obligation to reveal based on the relationship with the target, the desire for emotional expression and the desire for psychological support from the target. The most frequent reason to withhold information was the anticipation of a negative reaction from the target. Parents were more likely than others in the respondent's network to be the target of concealment acts, whereas close friends of the respondent were less likely than others to have information with-held. Parties in closer relationships were more likely than those in less close relationships to perform jointly enacted acts and acts directed toward members of the partner's network or the joint network.

Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Vol. 10, No. 3, 321-337 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/0265407593103002


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. J. Lehmiller Secret Romantic Relationships: Consequences for Personal and Relational Well-Being Pers Soc Psychol Bull, November 1, 2009; 35(11): 1452 - 1466. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. A. Suter, K. M. Bergen, K. L. Daas, and W. T. Durham Lesbian couples' management of public-private dialectical contradictions Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, June 1, 2006; 23(3): 349 - 365. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. A. Baxter, T. Dun, and E. Sahistein Rules for Relating Communicated among Social Network Members Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, April 1, 2001; 18(2): 173 - 199. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. A. Baxter and L. A. Erbert Perceptions of Dialectical Contradictions in Turning Points of Development in Heterosexual Romantic Relationships Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, October 1, 1999; 16(5): 547 - 569. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. A. Baxter, M. Mazanec, J. Nicholson, G. Pittman, K. Smith, and L. West Everyday Loyalties and Betrayals in Personal Relationships Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, October 1, 1997; 14(5): 655 - 678. [Abstract]

				J. de Jong Gierveld Research into Relationship Research Designs: Personal Relationships Under the Microscope Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, November 1, 1995; 12(4): 583 - 588. [Abstract]

				A. E. Beall and R. J. Sternberg The Social Construction of Love Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, August 1, 1995; 12(3): 417 - 438. [Abstract]