This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Monsour, M. Articles by Kurzweil, N. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Levels of Perspectives and the Perception of Intimacy in Cross-Sex Friendships: A Balance Theory Explanation of Shared Perceptual Reality

University of Colorado at Denver

Sam Betty

University of Colorado at Denver

Nancy Kurzweil

University of Colorado at Denver

Higher levels of interpersonal perception in personal relationships have been relatively ignored over the last decade, as well as the role played by those perceptions in the creation of a relationship. Through utilization of Balance Theory and a variation of Laing's Interpersonal Perception Method, this study investigated multiple levels of interpersonal perception in cross-sex friendships, and how those perceptions help create a shared perceptual reality among cross-sex friends. One hundred and three pairs of cross-sex friends completed a survey examining direct perspectives (DPs), metaperspectives (MPs), and metametaperspectives (MMPs), on various manifestations of intimacy, the importance of the friendship and the definition of the relationship. As predicted by Balance Theory, there was significant agreement, understanding and realization of understanding between cross-sex friends concerning intimacy in the relationship and the importance of friendship. Results also reveal that perceived agreement and perceived understanding in those friendships was significantly greater than actual agreement and understanding. In addition, there was strong evidence that individuals in cross-sex friendships use their own attitudes as a basis for predicting the attitudes of their partner - that they create their partner's perspectives so that they more closely agree with their own (i.e. they assimilate). These results question the acceptability of higher-order perspectives as fully validated constructs, and suggest that the location of explanatory force in POX systems may reside in individual level variables - as opposed to dyadic level measurements.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. M. Morry The attraction-similarity hypothesis among cross-sex friends: Relationship satisfaction, perceived similarities, and self-serving perceptions Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, February 1, 2007; 24(1): 117 - 138. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. M. Reeder 'I Like you... as a Friend': The Role of Attraction in Cross-Sex Friendship Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, June 1, 2000; 17(3): 329 - 348. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. S. Schneider and D. A. Kenny Cross-Sex Friends Who were Once Romantic Partners: Are they Platonic Friends Now? Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, June 1, 2000; 17(3): 451 - 466. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. J. Messman, D. J. Canary, and K. S. Hause Motives to Remain Platonic, Equity, and the Use of Maintenance Strategies in Opposite-Sex Friendships Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, February 1, 2000; 17(1): 67 - 94. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Voss, D. Markiewicz, and A. B. Doyle Friendship, Marriage and Self-Esteem Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, February 1, 1999; 16(1): 103 - 122. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. L. Kaplan and C. B. Keys Sex and Relationship Variables as Predictors of Sexual Attraction in Cross-Sex Platonic Friendships between Young Heterosexual Adults Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, April 1, 1997; 14(2): 191 - 206. [Abstract]