This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Gaines, S. O. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Impact of Interpersonal Traits and Gender-Role Compliance on Interpersonal Resource Exchange among Dating and Engaged/Married Couples

Pomona College

The following hypotheses regarding interpersonal resource exchange among (a) dating couples (n = 206 couples) and (b) engaged/married couples (n = 103 couples) were tested: (1) levels of affectionate behavior are reciprocated (i.e. paths are bidirectional) among couples; (2) levels of respectful behavior are reciprocated among couples; (3) individuals' reported affectionate and respectful behaviors are correlated positively; (4) individuals' affection-giving traits are better as positive predictors of individuals' affectionate behavior among engaged/married couples than among dating couples; (5) individuals' respect-giving traits are better as positive predictors of individuals' respectful behavior among engaged/married couples than among dating couples; (6) individuals' gender-role compliance is better as a negative predictor of individuals' affectionate behavior among dating couples than among engaged/married couples; and (7) individuals' gender-role compliance is better as a negative predictor of individuals' respectful behavior among dating couples than among engaged/married couples. Individuals' interpersonal traits and gender-role compliance were self-reported, whereas individuals' interpersonal behaviors were reported by their partners. Results supported Hypotheses 1-3 (derived from resource exchange theory proposed by Foa & Foa, 1974) but not Hypotheses 4-7 (derived from the model of levels of relational involvement proposed by Levinger & Snoek, 1972). Unexpectedly, affection-giving traits generally were positive predictors of affectionate and respectful behavior, whereas respect-giving traits generally did not predict affectionate or respectful behavior. Implications for the study of interpersonal traits, gender roles and behavioral reciprocity in heterosexual relationships are discussed.

Key Words: gender roles • interpersonal traits • resource ex-change

Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Vol. 13, No. 2, 241-261 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/0265407596132005


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. S. Hendrick and C. Hendrick Measuring respect in close relationships Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, December 1, 2006; 23(6): 881 - 899. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. J. Mendelson and A. C. Kay Positive Feelings in Friendship: Does Imbalance in the Relationship Matter? Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, February 1, 2003; 20(1): 101 - 116. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. Cole Lying to the One you Love: The Use of Deception in Romantic Relationships Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, February 1, 2001; 18(1): 107 - 129. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. O. Gaines Jr., D. I. Rios, C. S. Granrose, K. L. Bledsoe, K. R. Farris, M. S. P. Youn, and B. F. Garcia Romanticism and Interpersonal Resource Exchange among African American-Anglo and Other Interracial Couples Journal of Black Psychology, November 1, 1999; 25(4): 461 - 489. [Abstract] [PDF]