Journal of Social and Personal Relationships

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to browse PSPB online!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Whisman, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Allan, L. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Vol. 13, No. 2, 263-278 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/0265407596132006

Attachment and Social Cognition Theories of Romantic Relationships: Convergent or Complementary Perspectives?

Mark A. Whisman

Yale University, whisman{at}minerva.cis.yale.edu

Laura E. Allan

Ohio State University

Adult attachment and social cognition perspectives of romantic relationships have developed relatively independently of one another, despite the fact that both stress the importance of cognitive conceptual frameworks of relationship functioning. This study examines the strength of the association between constructs from the two perspectives and their associations with concurrent relationship adjustment and 6-month longitudinal relationship dissolution. Results from 68 dating couples suggested a modest degree of convergence between measures of attachment, relationship beliefs and relationship attributions. Measures of both adult attachment and relationship beliefs and attributions were uniquely related to concurrent relationship adjustment, although between-partner differences on attachment and social cognition measures were largely unrelated to relationship adjustment. The only relationship cognition variable that was predictive of subsequent relationship dissolution was stronger endorsement by women of partner responsibility attributions (i.e. viewing negative partner behavior as blameworthy, intentional and selfishly motivated). These results suggest that attachment and social cognition may offer complementary perspectives of romantic relationships.

Key Words: cognition • dissolution • satisfaction


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
N. L. Collins, M. B. Ford, A. C. Guichard, and L. M. Allard
Working Models of Attachment and Attribution Processes in Intimate Relationships
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, February 1, 2006; 32(2): 201 - 219.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Social and Personal RelationshipsHome page
T. N. Bradbury
Invited Program Overview: Research on Relationships as a Prelude to Action
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, October 1, 2002; 19(5): 571 - 599.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Social and Personal RelationshipsHome page
L. C. Gallo and T. W. Smith
Attachment Style in Marriage: Adjustment and Responses to Interaction
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, April 1, 2001; 18(2): 263 - 289.
[Abstract] [PDF]