This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rotenberg, K. J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Stigmatization of Transitions in Loneliness

Lakehead University

A total of 204 college students judged hypothetical peers that represented two types of Current Loneliness (Lonely vs Non-lonely) x two types of Transition in Loneliness (No-transition vs Transition). In the transition condition, the peers were shown as changing over the course of leaving home and attending college, from being lonely to non-lonely or from being non-lonely to lonely. Results showed that the students ascribed psychosocial functioning to the peers in the following order, from lowest to highest: no-transition lonely, transition lonely, transition non-lonely and no-transition nonlonely. Also, students reported less acceptance of the lonely than non-lonely peers and of the transition than no-transition peers, primarily for the non-lonely peer. Consistent with Weiner et al.'s (1988) causal analysis of stigmas, the more the college students believed that the loneliness and behavior of the transition lonely peer were not controllable by him or her, the more the students accepted the peer. Suggestions for future research included the investigation of the stigmatization of various transitions to loneliness, such as divorce or death of a spouse.

Key Words: loneliness • stigmatization • transitions

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?