Journal of Social and Personal Relationships

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miller, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Noirot, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Vol. 16, No. 2, 147-173 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/0265407599162002

Attachment Memories, Models and Information Processing

Judi Beinstein Miller

Melinda Noirot

Oberlin College

Working models of attachment are considered key mediators of responses to attachment-related events, but relatively little research examines their directive influence. In this study we investigated the dynamics of working models by means of a memory paradigm. Participants were tested for attachment orientation and several weeks later read an attachmentrelated story, performed an attachment-unrelated task, and took a cued-recall test about the story. They were additionally primed by the writing of supportive or rejecting friendship experiences either before reading the story or afterwards. Results provided evidence for two types of information processing effects, attachment-schematic information processing and attachment-related constraints on information processing capacity. Secure attachment was associated with better recall of positive story events when participants were primed by rejecting memories before the story. Fearful attachment was associated with better recall of negative story events, when participants were primed by either rejecting or supportive memories before the story. Fearful attachment was associated with impaired performance on the attachment-unrelated task, when participants were primed by rejecting memories prior to executing the task.

Key Words: attachment style • information processing • memories


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
D. Pereg and M. Mikulincer
Attachment Style and the Regulation of Negative Affect: Exploring Individual Differences in Mood Congruency Effects on Memory and Judgment
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, January 1, 2004; 30(1): 67 - 80.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
TraumatologyHome page
K. Kanninen, R.-L. Punamaki, and S. Qouta
Adult attachment and emotional responses to traumatic memories among Palestinian former political prisoners
Traumatology, September 1, 2003; 9(3): 127 - 154.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Social and Personal RelationshipsHome page
J. B. Miller
Attachment Models and Memory for Conversation
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, June 1, 2001; 18(3): 404 - 422.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Social and Personal RelationshipsHome page
J. B. Miller
Attachment Style and Memory for Attachment-Related Events
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, December 1, 1999; 16(6): 773 - 801.
[Abstract] [PDF]