This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (8) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Feeney, J. A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Issues of Closeness and Distance in Dating Relationships: Effects of Sex and Attachment Style

University of Queensland, j.feeney{at}psy.uq.edu.au

This study was designed to clarify the nature of partners' needs for closeness and distance in established dating relationships, by integrating theories of attachment, gender role socialization, and dialectical contradictions. Seventy-two couples who had been dating their partners for at least one year provided unstructured accounts of their relationships, and completed measures of attachment style and relationship satisfaction. Both qualitative and quantitative analyses were conducted. Results showed that issues of closeness and distance were highly salient, especially for insecurely attached individuals. The presence and nature of reported differences in partners' needs for closeness-distance were predicted by sex and by the attachment styles of both partners; these dif-ferences were also linked to relationship satisfaction. Participants frequently reported that interactions concerning closeness-distance had changed during the course of the relationship, supporting dialectical theorists' emphasis on the tension between needs for autonomy and connection. Recurrent conflicts over closeness-distance were linked with attachment insecurity, especially males' dismissing-avoid-ance. The results highlight the need to consider both sex and attachment style differences in explaining conflicts over closeness and distance.

Key Words: attachment • autonomy • connection • distance regulation

Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Vol. 16, No. 5, 571-590 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/0265407599165002


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Ozdemir Shopping Malls: Measuring Interpersonal Distance under Changing Conditions and across Cultures Field Methods, August 1, 2008; 20(3): 226 - 248. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Ben-Ari and Y. Lavee Dyadic closeness in marriage: From the inside story to a conceptual model Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, October 1, 2007; 24(5): 627 - 644. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. A. Hess Distance Regulation in Personal Relationships: The Development of a Conceptual Model and a Test of Representational Validity Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, October 1, 2002; 19(5): 663 - 683. [Abstract] [PDF]