Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Finkenauer, C.
Right arrow Articles by Hazam, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Disclosure and Secrecy in Marriage: Do Both Contribute to Marital Satisfaction?

Catrin Finkenauer

University of Utrecht, C.Finkenauer{at}fss.uu.nl

Hana Hazam

Parent-Child Center, Department of Social Services, City of Lod, Israel

This article proposes that not only disclosure but also secrecy should have a beneficial effect on satisfaction in close relationships. Disclosure and secrecy are determined by dispositional characteristics of relationship partners and by the unique relationship context in which they occur. Dispositional and contextual measures of disclosure and secrecy were included in a correlational study among married participants to answer the following questions: (1) do dispositional measures of disclosure and secrecy predict marital satisfaction? and (2) do contextual measures of disclosure and secrecy predict marital satisfaction? In addition, it examined to what extent dispositional measures of disclosure and secrecy predict communicative behavior between partners. Results showed that dispositional measures contributed only marginally to marital satisfaction, while contextual measures strongly contributed to marital satisfaction. Contextual disclosure and secrecy independently contributed to marital satisfaction. Dispositional measures failed to predict communicative behavior between partners. These findings suggest that both disclosure and secrecy are powerful mechanisms in marital relationships and that it is the process that occurs when partners interact with each other, rather than the characteristics of either or both, that affects marital satisfaction.

Key Words: disclosure • marital satisfaction • marriage • secrecy

Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Vol. 17, No. 2, 245-263 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/0265407500172005


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
C. Finkenauer, P. Kerkhof, F. Righetti, and S. Branje
Living Together Apart: Perceived Concealment as a Signal of Exclusion in Marital Relationships
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, October 1, 2009; 35(10): 1410 - 1422.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The Family JournalHome page
L. M. Slater and T. M. Cummings Aholou
What You Don't Know May Kill You: The Importance of Including Sexual Health in Premarital Counseling
The Family Journal, July 1, 2009; 17(3): 236 - 240.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Social and Personal RelationshipsHome page
R. Dekel, G. Enoch, and Z. Solomon
The contribution of captivity and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder to marital adjustment of Israeli couples
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, June 1, 2008; 25(3): 497 - 510.
[Abstract] [PDF]