This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (9) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Baxter, L. A. Articles by Sahistein, E. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Rules for Relating Communicated among Social Network Members

University of Iowa, leslie-baxter{at}uiowa.edu

Tim Dun

University of Iowa

Erin Sahistein

University of Richmond

Two studies were conducted on the rules of relating communicated in the social network interactions of young adults. Study 1 involved 68 university students who completed a two week diary recording interactions with others in which rules for conducting relationships were communicated. In general, rules for relating tended to be communicated among same-sex dyads or triads through advice-giving, sanctioning, and gossip. Rules dealt primarily with romantic relationships (qualities of desirable/eligible partners, and how to initiate, sustain, and dissolve relationships) and friendships (how to conduct them). Study 2 was a survey administered to 127 university students on the extent to which they followed these rules, the degree to which they would receive negative sanctions if the rules were violated, and whether they perceived the rules to be gender-linked. Although several rules were perceived to be gender-linked, few sex differences emerged on perceived sanctioning and on reported rule compliance. In general, rules of loyalty, openness/honesty, and respect applied to both friendship and romantic relationships.

Key Words: communication • gender • relationships • rules • social network

Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Vol. 18, No. 2, 173-199 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/0265407501182002


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. C. Van Epp, T. G. Futris, J. C. Van Epp, and K. Campbell The Impact of the PICK a Partner Relationship Education Program on Single Army Soldiers Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, June 1, 2008; 36(4): 328 - 349. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. S. Hendrick and C. Hendrick Measuring respect in close relationships Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, December 1, 2006; 23(6): 881 - 899. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Stafford, A. J. Merolla, and J. D. Castle When long-distance dating partners become geographically close Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, December 1, 2006; 23(6): 901 - 919. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. J. Lannutti For better or worse: Exploring the meanings of same-sex marriage within the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered community Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, February 1, 2005; 22(1): 5 - 18. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. M. Sahlstein Relating at a distance: Negotiating being together and being apart in long-distance relationships Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, October 1, 2004; 21(5): 689 - 710. [Abstract] [PDF]