This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (11) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Ross, L. R. Articles by Spinner, B. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

General and Specific Attachment Representations in Adulthood: Is there a Relationship?

Athabasca University, lyndar{at}athabascau.ca

Barry Spinner

University of New Brunswick

Social and relational research assessing adult attachment often appears to be based on the assumption that adults operate, in their interpersonal relationships, with a single internal working model of attachment. The current investigation explored attachment from an alternative perspective. We hypothesized that most adults will rate their attachment orientations differently depending on the relationship context in which the ratings are taken. We also expected that general measures of attachment, taken outside the context of specific relationships, would vary from attachment ratings adults report when they are referring to specific attachment relationships. Two hundred and twenty-four participants responded to a survey containing standardized measures (RQ: Bartholomew, 1990; Bartholomew & Horowitz, 1991) assessing Secure, Fearful, Preoccupied, and Dismissing attachment styles in four self-identified attachment relationships. The RQ was also used to measure general attachment orientations. Results indicated that the majority of adults rated themselves differently on each of the Secure, Fearful, Preoccupied, and Dismissing dimensions of the RQ across their various attachment relationships and that attachment ratings measured in response to specific attachment relationships were not equivalent to the attachment ratings measured outside the context of specific attachment relationships. This study sheds light on the associations between specific and general attachment tendencies and raises some concerns about conceptualization and measurement of adult attachment.

Key Words: adult attachment • general representations • measurement • specific representations

Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Vol. 18, No. 6, 747-766 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/0265407501186001


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. L. Buist, E. Reitz, and M. Dekovic Attachment stability and change during adolescence: A longitudinal application of the Social Relations Model Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, June 1, 2008; 25(3): 429 - 444. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. C. Klohnen, J. A. Weller, S. Luo, and M. Choe Organization and Predictive Power of General and Relationship-Specific Attachment Models: One for All, and All for One? Pers Soc Psychol Bull, December 1, 2005; 31(12): 1665 - 1682. [Abstract] [PDF]