This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (25) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Paul, E. L. Articles by Hayes, K. A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Casualties of `Casual' Sex: A Qualitative Exploration of the Phenomenology of College Students' Hookups

The College of New Jersey, bethpaul{at}tcnj.edu

Kristen A. Hayes

The College of New Jersey

One of the most prominent features of the current college campus environment is the casual sex practice of the hookup. Hookups are defined as a sexual encounter between two people who are brief acquaintances or strangers, usually lasting only one night without the expectation of developing a relationship (Paul, McManus, & Hayes, 2000). Although there is a vast literature on college students' casual sexual attitudes and behavior, there is little attention to (a) subjective or experiential elements of and (b) the heterogeneity of casual sexual experiences. The goal of this study was to explore the varied phenomenology or experiential reality of college students' casual sexual hookup experiences. A structured questionnaire soliciting open responses regarding college students' views of a typical hookup and reports of their best and worst hookup experiences was administered to 187 college students. Responses were microanalytically content analyzed and globally thematically analyzed. College students' accounts of hookup experiences included behavioral, situational, cognitive, and emotional elements. As expected, although there was relative uniformity in college students' descriptions of a typical hookup, there was wide variation in college students' descriptions of their best and worst hookup experiences. Moreover, whereas there were few differences between males' and females' descriptions of what transpired, there were some sex differences in descriptions of what was felt after actual casual sexual experiences and in interpretations of why experiences were good or bad.

Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Vol. 19, No. 5, 639-661 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0265407502195006


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. M. Downing-Matibag and B. Geisinger Hooking Up and Sexual Risk Taking Among College Students: A Health Belief Model Perspective Qual Health Res, September 1, 2009; 19(9): 1196 - 1209. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Crown and L. J. Roberts Against their will: Young women's nonagentic sexual experiences Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, June 1, 2007; 24(3): 385 - 405. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. F. Flack Jr., K. A. Daubman, M. L. Caron, J. A. Asadorian, N. R. D'Aureli, S. N. Gigliotti, A. T. Hall, S. Kiser, and E. R. Stine Risk Factors and Consequences of Unwanted Sex Among University Students: Hooking Up, Alcohol, and Stress Response J Interpers Violence, February 1, 2007; 22(2): 139 - 157. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. D. Barta and S. M. Kiene Motivations for infidelity in heterosexual dating couples: The roles of gender, personality differences, and sociosexual orientation Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, June 1, 2005; 22(3): 339 - 360. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. J. Lannutti For better or worse: Exploring the meanings of same-sex marriage within the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered community Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, February 1, 2005; 22(1): 5 - 18. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. C. Morr and P. A. Mongeau First-Date Expectations: The Impact of Sex of Initiator, Alcohol Consumption, and Relationship Type Communication Research, February 1, 2004; 31(1): 3 - 35. [Abstract] [PDF]