Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to browse PSPB online!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Backman, C. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Interpersonal Congruency Theory Revisited: A Revision and Extension

Carl W. Backman

University of Nevada, Reno, USA

While the basic premise of interpersonal congruency theory - that stability and change in persons' behaviour are a function of stability and change in their relations with others - remains tenable, a number of modifications to this approach to personality seem warranted. The theory suffered from an overemphasis on the effects of the views of others on the self and on the role of various congruency-producing processes in maintaining stability while neglecting their role in self-creation and change. Furthermore, the focus was on the individual's unilateral attempt to maintain congruency rather than on viewing the resulting relationship and the identities therein as unique products of both partners' attempts to create, maintain and at times change themselves and the character of their relationship. The revised theory rectifies those defects and places greater emphasis on self presentation and altercasting. Both of these processes are given expanded meaning and are viewed as occurring in the conduct of both partners and in their conversations. A number of new lines of research are suggested by this reformulation, including further work on these two processes and on role selection and portrayal as well as on the dynamics of problematic identities.

Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Vol. 2, No. 4, 489-505 (1985)
DOI: 10.1177/0265407585024008


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?