Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lease, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Viken, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Assessing Children’s Representations of their Peer Group Using a Multidimensional Scaling Technique

A. Michele Lease

University of Georgiamlease{at}coe.uga.edu

Richard M. McFall

Indiana University

Teresa A. Treat

Yale University

Richard J. Viken

Indiana University

The goal of this research was to examine whether multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) is a potentially reliable and valid method for assessing children’s perceptions of their peer group. A total of 162 fourth- and fifth-grade students participated in two studies. MDS-derived depictions of the peer group were generated based on children’s unconstrained (i.e., implicit) similarity judgments of same-sex dyads in their peer group. Overall, fit indices indicated that two-dimensional MDS solutions accounted for most of the variability in group members’ similarity ratings, demonstrating considerable agreement between group members’ implicit representations of their peer group. Furthermore, classroom teachers’ perceptions of peer group organization were highly similar to their students’ perceptions. Finally, the social network pattern in the peer group was related consistently to the organization of peer group members in the MDS similarity space; additional variance in the MDS space was accounted for by behavioral and nonbehavioral characteristics, most notably prosocial behavior. The results of this two-part study show the promise of using MDS methods to assess, and thus investigate, children’s perceptions of their peer group’s organizational structure. It was argued that implicit approaches to understanding children’s perceptions of their peer group would be a useful addition to findings derived from the explicit methods typically employed in peer relations research.

Key Words: children’s peer groups • multidimensional scaling • social networks • social structure

Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Vol. 20, No. 6, 707-728 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0265407503206001


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
International Journal of Behavioral DevelopmentHome page
K. Kwon and A. M. Lease
Examination of the contribution of clique characteristics to children's adjustment: Clique type and perceived cohesion
International Journal of Behavioral Development, May 1, 2009; 33(3): 230 - 242.
[Abstract] [PDF]