This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (8) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Wood, J. T. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Monsters and victims: Male felons’ accounts of intimate partner violence

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Previous research on men who commit intimate partner violence has addressed two questions: (1) how can researchers and clinicians classify men’s accounts of intimate partner violence?, and (2) do men who engage in intimate partner violence subscribe to particular codes of manhood? The present study linked these two questions by asking how men account for their own intimate partner violence and how their accounts draw upon understandings of manhood. Grounded theory analysis of interviews with 22 incarcerated men identified three categories of themes in participants’ accounts of intimate partner violence: justifications (‘she disrespected me as a man;’ ‘a man has a right to control his woman;’ ‘she provoked me;’ ‘she took it’); dissociations (‘I am not the abusive type;’ ‘my violence was limited, and abusers don’t limit their abuse’); and remorse (‘I regret I abused her’). Divergence among these representations of violent men’s reasons for violence and previous typologies reflects this study’s focus on insiders’ views of behavior. Also, the themes that emerged from participants were informed by conflicting, although not wholly independent, codes of manhood that circulate in U. S. cultural life. Attention to violent men’s sense-making strategies and contradictory narratives of manhood suggests opportunities for intervention and rehabilitation.

Key Words: abuse • accounts • gender • intimate partner violence • manhood

Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Vol. 21, No. 5, 555-576 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0265407504045887


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. Boonzaier `If the Man Says you Must Sit, Then you Must Sit': The Relational Construction of Woman Abuse: Gender, Subjectivity and Violence Feminism Psychology, May 1, 2008; 18(2): 183 - 206. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Duck Silver anniversary essay: A past and a future for relationship research Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, February 1, 2008; 25(1): 189 - 200. [PDF]

				J. L. Hardesty and L. H. Ganong How women make custody decisions and manage co-parenting with abusive former husbands Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, August 1, 2006; 23(4): 543 - 563. [Abstract] [PDF]