Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (20)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Solomon, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Knobloch, L. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A model of relational turbulence: The role of intimacy, relational uncertainty, and interference from partners in appraisals of irritations

Denise Haunani Solomon

Pennsylvania State Universitydhs12{at}psu.edu

Leanne K. Knobloch

University of Illinois

The development of romantic relationships is a complex process by which previously autonomous individuals come to perceive themselves as a social unit. We propose that the transition from casual dating to serious involvement coincides with relational turbulence in courtship, and we identify relational uncertainty and interference from partners as mechanisms that may explain why this turmoil occurs. We test our model by examining people’s appraisals of irritating circumstances as a marker of relational turbulence. We conducted a cross-sectional study in which individuals evaluated the degree of severity and relationship threat of potential irritations that had occurred recently in their dating relationship. Although the effect size was small, results consistent with our predictions indicated that negative appraisals were curvilinearly associated with intimacy. Also as anticipated, we documented positive associations between negative appraisals and both relational uncertainty and interference from partners. Contrary to our expectations, however, neither relational uncertainty nor interference from partners mediated the curvilinear trajectory between negative appraisals and intimacy. We discuss the implications of these findings for understanding relational turbulence in dating relationships.

Key Words: courtship • interference from partners • intimacy • relational turbulence • relational uncertainty

Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Vol. 21, No. 6, 795-816 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0265407504047838


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
C. Finkenauer, P. Kerkhof, F. Righetti, and S. Branje
Living Together Apart: Perceived Concealment as a Signal of Exclusion in Marital Relationships
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, October 1, 2009; 35(10): 1410 - 1422.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
J. A. Theiss and L. K. Knobloch
An Actor-Partner Interdependence Model of Irritations in Romantic Relationships
Communication Research, August 1, 2009; 36(4): 510 - 537.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
L. K. Knobloch
Extending the Emotion-in-Relationships Model to Conversation
Communication Research, December 1, 2008; 35(6): 822 - 848.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Social and Personal RelationshipsHome page
K. R. Steuber and D. Haunani Solomon
Relational uncertainty, partner interference, and infertility: A qualitative study of discourse within online forums
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, October 1, 2008; 25(5): 831 - 855.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Social and Personal RelationshipsHome page
L. K. Knobloch
The content of relational uncertainty within marriage
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, June 1, 2008; 25(3): 467 - 495.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
P. A. Mongeau, J. Jacobsen, and C. Donnerstein
Defining Dates and First Date Goals: Generalizing From Undergraduates to Single Adults
Communication Research, October 1, 2007; 34(5): 526 - 547.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Social and Personal RelationshipsHome page
L. K. Knobloch
Perceptions of turmoil within courtship: Associations with intimacy, relational uncertainty, and interference from partners
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, June 1, 2007; 24(3): 363 - 384.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Social and Personal RelationshipsHome page
L. Stafford, A. J. Merolla, and J. D. Castle
When long-distance dating partners become geographically close
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, December 1, 2006; 23(6): 901 - 919.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
J. A. Theiss and D. H. Solomon
A Relational Turbulence Model of Communication About Irritations in Romantic Relationships
Communication Research, October 1, 2006; 33(5): 391 - 418.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Adolescent ResearchHome page
N. Korobov and A. Thorne
Intimacy and Distancing: Young Men's Conversations About Romantic Relationships
Journal of Adolescent Research, January 1, 2006; 21(1): 27 - 55.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
L. K. Knobloch and D. H. Solomon
Relational Uncertainty and Relational Information Processing: Questions without Answers?
Communication Research, June 1, 2005; 32(3): 349 - 388.
[Abstract] [PDF]