Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barta, W. D.
Right arrow Articles by Kiene, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Motivations for infidelity in heterosexual dating couples: The roles of gender, personality differences, and sociosexual orientation

William D. Barta

Washington University in St. Louis, william.barta{at}uconn.edu

Susan M. Kiene

Washington University in St. Louis

A motivational/individual differences model of infidelity is proposed in the course of empirically evaluating the traditional dichotomy between emotional and sexual motives. A scale assessing motivations for infidelity was developed and administered to 432 college students, 120 of whom reported past dating infidelity. Four motivations were identified and were associated as predicted with Big Five and other trait constructs; Sex was predicted by male gender, lower age, and unrestricted sociosexual orientation (SO); Dissatisfaction was predicted by female gender and Extraversion; Neglect was predicted by Neuroticism; and Anger by Neuroticism and low Agreeableness. As predicted, a two-factor model provides a poorer fit with the data than a multi-factor model. Unrestricted SO partially mediates the gender difference in endorsement of a sex motive for infidelity.

Key Words: Big Five • dating infidelity • extra-dyadic relationships • jealousy • sociosexual orientation

Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Vol. 22, No. 3, 339-360 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0265407505052440
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 New Media SocietyHome page
J. Peter and P. M. Valkenburg
Who looks for casual dates on the internet? A test of the compensation and the recreation hypotheses
New Media Society, June 1, 2007; 9(3): 455 - 474.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Social and Personal RelationshipsHome page
K. Salmela-Aro, K. Aunola, T. Saisto, E. Halmesmaki, and J.-E. Nurmi
Couples share similar changes in depressive symptoms and marital satisfaction anticipating the birth of a child
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, October 1, 2006; 23(5): 781 - 803.
[Abstract] [PDF]