This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (12) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Amodio, D. M. Articles by Showers, C. J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

‘Similarity breeds liking’ revisited: The moderating role of commitment

New York University

Carolin J. Showers

University of Oklahoma

The association between perceived similarity and liking for a romantic partner was examined in college students' relationships over the course of one year. Despite substantial evidence that similarity breeds attraction, perceived attribute similarity was positively correlated with liking only in highcommitment relationships. In low-commitment relationships, perceived dissimilarity was associated with greater liking and with maintenance of liking over time, consistent with Aron and Aron's (1997) self-expansion model. Relationship status (ongoing or ended) after one year was primarily explained by commitment at time 1. However, high perceived similarity appeared to buffer couples against destructive accommodation responses; relatively destructive responses were associated with ended status only when perceived similarity was low.

Key Words: attraction • commitment • liking • perceived similarity • relationships • self

Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Vol. 22, No. 6, 817-836 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0265407505058701


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. H. Eagly, P. W. Eastwick, and M. Johannesen-Schmidt Possible Selves in Marital Roles: The Impact of the Anticipated Division of Labor on the Mate Preferences of Women and Men Pers Soc Psychol Bull, April 1, 2009; 35(4): 403 - 414. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. M. Montoya, R. S. Horton, and J. Kirchner Is actual similarity necessary for attraction? A meta-analysis of actual and perceived similarity Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, December 1, 2008; 25(6): 889 - 922. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Jing Zhang and J. M. M. Bloemer The Impact of Value Congruence on Consumer-Service Brand Relationships Journal of Service Research, November 1, 2008; 11(2): 161 - 178. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Smithson and C. Baker Risk orientation, loving, and liking in long-term romantic relationships Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, February 1, 2008; 25(1): 87 - 103. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. M. Morry The attraction-similarity hypothesis among cross-sex friends: Relationship satisfaction, perceived similarities, and self-serving perceptions Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, February 1, 2007; 24(1): 117 - 138. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. J. Lutz-Zois, A. C. Bradley, J. L. Mihalik, and E. R. Moorman-Eavers Perceived similarity and relationship success among dating couples: An idiographic approach Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, December 1, 2006; 23(6): 865 - 880. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Strachman and J. Schimel Terror management and close relationships: Evidence that mortality salience reduces commitment among partners with different worldviews Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, December 1, 2006; 23(6): 965 - 978. [Abstract] [PDF]