Journal of Social and Personal Relationships

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Foster, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, W. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Vol. 23, No. 3, 367-386 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0265407506064204

Theoretical models of narcissism, sexuality, and relationship commitment

Joshua D. Foster

University of South Alabama

Ilan Shrira

University of Florida

W. Keith Campbell

University of Georgia

The present research examines the link between narcissistic personality and sexuality. Additionally, it explores how sexuality may inform the operation of narcissism within the context of close relationships. Two theoretical models, each addressing one of these issues, were evaluated empirically. Our first proposed model suggests that the agentic nature of narcissism explains why narcissism is linked to less restricted forms of sexual attitudes and behaviors (i.e., unrestricted sociosexuality). Our second proposed model suggests that a consequence of the sexual attitudes and behaviors associated with narcissism is low relationship commitment. Both of these models received empirical support. Discussion centers upon the theoretical implications and limitations of these models.

Key Words: agency • commitment • narcissism • sexuality • sociosexuality


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
L. E. Buffardi and W. K. Campbell
Narcissism and Social Networking Web Sites
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, October 1, 2008; 34(10): 1303 - 1314.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
J. D. Foster and R. F. Trimm IV
On Being Eager and Uninhibited: Narcissism and Approach-Avoidance Motivation
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, July 1, 2008; 34(7): 1004 - 1017.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Social and Personal RelationshipsHome page
J. D. Foster
Incorporating personality into the investment model: Probing commitment processes across individual differences in narcissism
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, April 1, 2008; 25(2): 211 - 223.
[Abstract] [PDF]