Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Conville, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Relational Transitions: An Inquiry into their Structure and Function

Richard L. Conville

University of Southern Mississippi

Over the years there has been a persistent concern over the nature of relational transitions, the use of case study methods to investigate them, and a phenomenology of relationship partners. In this study, these three concerns were brought together and a structural analysis was performed on two spouses' narrative accounts of their near divorce. The analysis indicated (1) that the two accounts had a common underlying structure involving four types of episodes: Anticipation, Separation, Discovery and Reconciliation; (2) that the structure of the accounts was marked by three types of dialectical oppositions: affect, intimacy and time; and (3) that the period of relational transition was a time for the establishment of new meanings and new rules for relational practice. Further research was suggested on the role of crisis in relational regeneration.

Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Vol. 5, No. 4, 423-437 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/0265407588054003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Social and Personal RelationshipsHome page
L. A. Erbert
Conflict and Dialectics: Perceptions of Dialectical Contradictions in Marital Conflict
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, August 1, 2000; 17(4-5): 638 - 659.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Social and Personal RelationshipsHome page
L. A. Baxter and L. A. Erbert
Perceptions of Dialectical Contradictions in Turning Points of Development in Heterosexual Romantic Relationships
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, October 1, 1999; 16(5): 547 - 569.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
S. Sprecher and S. Duck
Sweet Talk: The Importance of Perceived Communication for Romantic and Friendship Attraction Experienced During a Get-Acquainted Date
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, August 1, 1994; 20(4): 391 - 400.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Social and Personal RelationshipsHome page
M. D. Newcomb
Social Support by Many Other Names: Towards a Unified Conceptualization
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, November 1, 1990; 7(4): 479 - 494.
[Abstract]