|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Social Network Analysis: A Structural Perspective for Family Studies
Alan C. Acock
Louisiana State University
Jeanne S. Hurlbert
Louisiana State University
We review research on egocentric networks to show how network analysis provides both a distinctive perspective and a methodology for studying the family. In this perspective, individuals are influenced by social networks but are also active agents in their creation. We describe such key concepts as density, range, size, homogeneity and homophily. We also consider network stability, affect structure, segmentation and overlap. We discuss a number of methodological issues along with work in selected substantive areas. Finally, we discuss the data resources of network analysis and suggest an agenda for family applications of network concepts and methodology.
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Vol. 7, No. 2,
245-264 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/0265407590072006

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. M. Koehly, S. K. Peterson, B. G. Watts, K. K. G. Kempf, S. W. Vernon, and E. R. Gritz
A Social Network Analysis of Communication about Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer Genetic Testing and Family Functioning
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.,
April 1, 2003;
12(4):
304 - 313.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. D. Widmer and L.-A. La Farga
Family Networks: A Sociometric Method to Study Relationships in Families
Field Methods,
May 1, 2000;
12(2):
108 - 128.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Samuelsson, G. Thernlund, and J. Ringstrom
Using the Five Field Map to Describe the Social Network of Children: A Methodological Study
International Journal of Behavioral Development,
June 1, 1996;
19(2):
327 - 345.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. C. Jones
Parental Divorce, Family Conflict and Friendship Networks
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,
May 1, 1992;
9(2):
219 - 235.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|
|
|