Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Veiel, H.O.F.
Right arrow Articles by Herrie, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Social Support Networks of Chronically Strained Couples: Similarity and Overlap

H.O.F. Veiel

Central Institute of Mental Health, Mannheim

M. Crisand

Central Institute of Mental Health, Mannheim

H. Stroszeck-Somschor

Central Institute of Mental Health, Mannheim

J. Herrie

Central Institute of Mental Health, Mannheim

The structure and composition of social support networks were examined in a sample of fifty-seven chronically strained couples. Data were collected with structured interviews and arranged in `support matrices' of network members by support functions, and each network member was individually tagged. Scores representing the size of the overall support networks and the number of support providers in specific functional categories were computed separately for relatives and for friends/acquaintances. Principal component analysis (PCA) with couples as `cases' was used to evaluate common and individual determinants of support networks. In addition, for all categories of support providers the actual overlap between wives' and husbands' networks was computed. The determinants of the overall and specific support networks were largely couple specific, resulting in a considerable similarity of spouses' networks regarding size and composition. However, the sets of confidants of husbands and wives were almost completely disjunctive. Specific sex differences were also found. The results are discussed with respect to the health-promoting functions of marriage.

Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Vol. 8, No. 2, 279-292 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/0265407591082007


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Research on Social Work PracticeHome page
J. M. Richman, L. B. Rosenfeld, and C. J. Hardy
The Social Support Survey: A Validation Study of a Clinical Measure of the Social Support Process
Research on Social Work Practice, July 1, 1993; 3(3): 288 - 311.
[Abstract] [PDF]