This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Ross, M. Articles by Holmberg, D. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Are Wives' Memories for Events in Relationships more Vivid than their Husbands' Memories?

University of Waterloo

Diane Holmberg

University of Waterloo

Gender differences in socialization and marital roles may lead wives to attend more closely to relationship interactions than their spouses do; wives may also assign greater importance to such interactions and deliberate more about them. As a result, wives would possess more vivid memories than their husbands have for events in their relationship. Spouses tape-recorded descriptions of their first date together, a shared vacation and an argument between the two of them. They subsequently assessed the clarity of their own recall of each event. Women reported more vivid memories than did their husbands. Women also attributed greater personal importance to the events, reported reminiscing about them more often and expressed more affect in their event descriptions than did their husbands. The best predictors of spouses' clarity ratings were frequency of reminiscing about the event and, for the argument, outcome of the dispute. After reading typed transcripts of spouses' descriptions of each event, observers completed the same clarity of recall questions as the couples. Observers judged the women's recall to be more vivid. The best predictor of observers' clarity judgments was the number of affective statements in a description. The results were discussed in terms of their implications for social memory and marital relations.

Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Vol. 9, No. 4, 585-604 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/0265407592094007


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. M. Andreano and L. Cahill Sex influences on the neurobiology of learning and memory Learn. Mem., March 24, 2009; 16(4): 248 - 266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Baron and S. Bluck Autobiographical memory sharing in everyday life: Characteristics of a good story International Journal of Behavioral Development, March 1, 2009; 33(2): 105 - 117. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. M. Gagne and J. E. Lydon Bias and Accuracy in Close Relationships: An Integrative Review Personality and Social Psychology Review, November 1, 2004; 8(4): 322 - 338. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. K. Acitelli, S. Rogers, and C. R. Knee The Role of Identity in the Link between Relationship Thinking and Relationship Satisfaction Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, October 1, 1999; 16(5): 591 - 618. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. P. Ruvolo and J. Veroff For Better or for Worse: Real-Ideal Discrepancies and the Marital Well-Being of Newlyweds Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, April 1, 1997; 14(2): 223 - 242. [Abstract]