Journal of Social and Personal Relationships

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stevens, N.
Right arrow Articles by Westerhof, G. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Vol. 23, No. 6, 921-941 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0265407506070474

Partners and others: Social provisions and loneliness among married Dutch men and women in the second half of life

Nan Stevens

Radboud University, stevens{at}psych.ru.nl

Gerben J. Westerhof

Radboud University

The main goal of this article was to test whether the perceived availability of social provisions within and outside marriage in a representative Dutch sample of men and women in late adulthood would differ from findings from similar studies in the United States. We predicted that there would be more similarity between married men and women in self-reported social relationships, social provisions, and loneliness in the more feminine culture of The Netherlands than is often reported in research from the United States, where the dominant culture is more masculine. Data are from the Dutch Aging survey that involved a representative sample of 983 people between the ages of 40 and 85. As predicted, we found similarity between men and women in the size and composition of core networks, the provision of emotional support to and from the partner, and in the provision of instrumental support to others. Contrary to our hypothesis, women exchanged more emotional support with friends, children, and other family and identified these persons more often as companions in leisure activities. Despite the women’s greater reported involvement in other relationships, these men were not lonelier than were women. For both men and women, social provisions from close relationships beyond the partner relation contributed to alleviating loneliness.

Key Words: gender differences • late adulthood • loneliness • marriage • social provisions

References

  • Acitelli, L. K. (1996). The neglected links between marital support and marital satisfaction. In G. B. Sarason, B. R. Sarason, & I. G. Sarason (Eds.), Handbook of social support and the family (pp. 83-103). New York: Plenum Press.
  • Acitelli, L. K., & Antonucci, T. C. (1994). Gender differences in the link between marital support and satisfaction in older couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 688-698.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Antonucci, T. (1990). Social supports and social relationships. In R. H. Binstock & L. K. George (Eds.), Handbook of aging and the social sciences (3rd ed.) (pp. 205-226). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Antonucci, T. (2001). Social relations: An examination of social networks, social support and sense of control. In J. E. Birren, K. W. Schaie, & R. B. Abeles (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (pp. 427-453). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Antonucci, T., & Akiyama, H. (1987). An examination of sex differences in social support among older men and women. Sex Roles, 17, 737-749.[CrossRef]
  • Antonucci, T., Langfahl, E. S., & Akiyama, H. (2004). Relationships as outcomes and contexts. In F. R. Lang & K. L. Fingerman (Eds.), Growing together: Personal relationships across the life span (pp. 24-44). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1995). Multiple significance tests: The Bonferroni method. British Medical Journal, 310, 170-170.[Free Full Text]
  • Briggs, S. R., & Cheek, J. M. (1986). The role of factor analysis in the development and evaluation of personality scales. Journal of Personality, 54, 106-148.[CrossRef]
  • Carstensen, L. L. (1991). Selectivity theory: Social activity in life-span context. Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 11, 195-217.
  • Cutrona, C. E. (1996). Social support in couples: Marriage as a resource in times of stress. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  • Deeg, D. J. H., & Braam, A. W. (1997). Het belang van kwaliteit van leven voor ouderen zelf: Een kwantitatieve benadering. [The importance of quality of life for the elderly: A quantitative approach]. Medische Antropologie, 9, 136-149.
  • De Jong Gierveld, J., & Dykstra, P. A. (1998). Eenzaam of niet eenzaam? Identificatie van risico-groepen onder oudere mannen en vrouwen. [Lonely or not lonely? Identification of risk groups among older men and women.] In M. I. Broese van Groenou, D. J. H. Deeg, C. P. M. Knipscheer, & G. J. Ligthart (Eds.), VU-Visies op veroudering. Amsterdam: Thela Thesis.
  • De Jong Gierveld, J., & Kamphuis, F. (1985). The development of a Rasch-type loneliness scale. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 289-299.[Abstract]
  • De Jong-Gierveld, J., & Van Tilburg, T. (1987). The partner as source of social support in problem and non-problem situations. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 2, 191-200.
  • De Jong Gierveld, J., & Van Tilburg, T. (1995). Social relationships, integration and loneliness. In C. P. M. Knipscheer, J. de Jong Gierveld, T. van Tilburg, & P. A. Dykstra (Eds.), Living arrangements and social networks of older adults (pp. 155-172). Amsterdam: VU University Press.
  • De Jong Gierveld, J., & Van Tilburg, T. (1999). Manual of the loneliness scale. Amsterdam: Free University.
  • Depner, C. E., & Ingersoll-Dayton, B. (1985). Conjugal social support: Patterns in later life. Journal of Gerontology, 40, 761-766.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Dittmann-Kohli, F., Bode, C., & Westerhof, G. J. (Eds.) (2001). Die zweite Lebenshälfte: Psychologische Perspektiven -Ergebnisse des Alters-survey. [The second half of life: Psychological perspectives -Findings of the German Aging Survey.] Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
  • Dykstra, P. A. (1993). The differential availability of relationships and the provision and effectiveness of support to older adults. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 355-370.[Abstract]
  • Gallagher, S. K., & Gerstel, N. (1993). Kinkeeping and friend keeping among older women: The effect of marriage. Gerontologist, 33, 675-681.[Abstract]
  • Gove, W. R., Hughes, M., & Style, C. B. (1983). Does marriage have positive effects on the psychological wellbeing of the individual? Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24, 122-131.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Gurung, R. A. R., Taylor, S. E., & Seeman, T. E. (2003). Accounting for changes in social support among married older adults: Insights from the MacArthur studies of successful aging. Psychology and Aging, 18, 487-496.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  • Joung, I. M. A., Stronks, K., Van de Mheen, H., Van Poppel, F. W. A., Van der Meer, J. B. W., & Mackenback, J. P. (1997). The contribution of intermediary factors to marital status differences in self-reported health. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 476-490.[CrossRef]
  • Kendig, H., Koyano, W. U., Tatsuto, A., & Takatoshi, A. (1999). Social support of older people in Australia and Japan. Ageing and Society, 19, 185-207.[CrossRef]
  • Kohli, M., & Künemund, H. (Eds.). (2000). Die zweite Lebenshälfte: Gesellschaftliche Lage und Partizipation im Spiegel des Alters-survey. [The second half of life: Societal positions and participation -Findings of the German Aging Survey.] Opladen: Leske & Budrich.
  • Korporaal, M., M. Broese Van Groenou, & T. Van Tilburg (2005). Dynamics of support exchanges within the marital relationship in late life. Manuscript submitted for publication.
  • Perlman, D., & Peplau, L. A. (1981). Towards a social psychology of loneliness. In R. Gilmour & S. W. Duck (Eds.), Personal relationships in disorder (pp. 31-56). London: Academic Press.
  • Pinquart, M. (2003). Loneliness in married, widowed, divorced, and never-married older adults. Journal of Personal and Social Relationships, 20, 31-53.
  • Pinquart, M., & Sörensen, S. (2001). Influences on loneliness in older adults: A meta-analysis. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 23, 245-266.[CrossRef]
  • Quirouette, C., & Gold, D. P. (1992). Spousal characteristics as predictors of wellbeing in older couples. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 34, 257-269.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Rook, K. (1984). The negative side of social interaction: Impact on psychological wellbeing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1097-1108.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Rook, K. (1987). Social support versus companionship: Effects on life stress, loneliness, and evaluation by others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1132-1147.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Rook, K. (2003). Exposure and reactivity to negative social exchanges: A preliminary investigation using daily diary data. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 58B, P100-P111.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Ross, C. E. (1995). Reconceptualizing marital status as a continuum of attachment. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 129-140.[CrossRef]
  • Rossi, A. (1993). Intergenerational relations: Gender, norms and behavior. In V. L. Bengtson & U. W. A. Achenbaum (Eds.), The changing contract across generations (pp. 191-217). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
  • Scholte, R. H. J., Van Lieshout, C. F. M., & van Aken, M. A. G. (2001). Relational support in adolescence: Factors, types and adjustment. Journal of Research in Adolescence, 11, 71-94.[CrossRef]
  • Stack, S. J., & Eshleman, J. R. (1998). Marital status and happiness: A 17-nation study. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 527-536.[CrossRef]
  • Stevens, N., & Westerhof, G. J. (2006). Marriage, social integration and loneliness in the second half of life: A comparison of Dutch and German men and women. Research on Aging, 28, 713-729.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Steverink, N., Westerhof, G. J., Bode, C., & Dittmann-Kohli, F. (2001). Dutch Aging Survey: Onderzoeksdesign en instrumenten. [Research and design instruments.] Nijmegen: University of Nijmegen, Centre for Psychogerontology.
  • Tornstam, L. (1992). Loneliness in marriage. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9, 197-217.[Abstract]
  • Van Tilburg, T. (1995). Delineation of the social network and differences in network size. In C. P. M. Knipscheer, J. de Jong Gierveld, T. van Tilburg, & P. A. Dykstra (Eds.), Living arrangements and social networks of older adults (pp. 83-96). Amsterdam: VU University Press.
  • van Tilburg, T., Broese van Groenou, M., & Thomese, F. (1995). Flow of support. In C. P. M. Knipscheer, J. de Jong Gierveld, T. van Tilburg, & P. A. Dykstra (Eds.), Living arrangements and social networks of older adults (pp. 131-154). Amsterdam: VU University Press.
  • Walen, H. R., & Lachman, M. E. (2000). Social support and strain from partner, family and friends: Costs and benefits for men and women in adulthood. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 5-30.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Weiss, R. S. (1974). The provisions of social relationships. In Z. Rubin (Ed.), Doing unto others: Joining, molding, conforming, helping loving (pp. 17-26). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stevens, N.
Right arrow Articles by Westerhof, G. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?