Journal of Social and Personal Relationships

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Widmer, E. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Vol. 23, No. 6, 979-998 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0265407506070482

Who are my family members? Bridging and binding social capital in family configurations

Eric D. Widmer

University of Lausanne, eric.widmer{at}unil.ch

This study tests the hypothesis that individuals’ identification of family members has an impact on the type of family-based social capital available to them. Data from a sample of college students from three universities in Switzerland (N = 229), provided evidence that seven typical family configurations coexist. These configurations vary with respect to the importance given to partnerships, friendships, stepparents and parents’ relatives. Family configurations based on blood connections provide a ‘binding’ type of social capital, that is, densely connected family networks with low individual centrality, whereas family configurations based on friendship provide a ‘bridging’ type of social capital, that is, sparsely connected family networks with high individual centrality. Postdivorce family configurations are associated with neither type of social capital.

Key Words: divorce • family networks • family network method (FNM) • kinship • remarriage • social capital

References

  • Adams, B. N. (1999). Cross-cultural and U.S. kinship. In M. B. Sussman, S. K. Steinmetz, & G. W. Peterson (Eds.), Handbook of Marriage and the Family (pp. 77-92). New York: Plenum Press.
  • Baker, W. (1984). The social structure of a national securities market. American Journal of Sociology, 89, 775-811.[CrossRef]
  • Banfield, E. (1958). The moral basis of a backward society. Chicago: The Free Press.
  • Batagelj, V., & Mrvar, A. (1998). Pajek: Program for analyzing large networks. Software downloaded from http://vlado.fmf.uni-lj.si/pub/networks/pajek/.
  • Bengston, V., Rosenthal, C., & Burton, L. (1990). Families and Aging: Diversity and Heterogeneity. In R. H. Binstock & L. K. George (Eds.), Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences (pp. 263-287). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Bernardes, J. (1993). Responsibilities in studying postmodern families. Journal of Family Issues, 14, 35-49.[Abstract]
  • Biblarz, T., Raftery, A., & Bucur, A. (1997). Family structure and social mobility. Social Forces, 75, 1319-1341.[CrossRef]
  • Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Borgatti, S., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). UCINET 6 for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
  • Borgen, F. H., & Barnett, D. C. (1987). Applying cluster analysis in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 456-468.[CrossRef]
  • Bourdieu, P. (1985). The forms of capital. In J. C. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-258). New York: Greenwood.
  • Burt, R. (1995). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Burt, R. (2002). The social capital of structural holes. In M. F. Guilléen, R. Collins, P. England, & M. Meyer (Eds.), The new economic sociology: Developments in an emerging field (pp. 148-190). New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
  • Cherlin, A. J., Chase-Lansdale, J., Lindsay, P., & McRae, C. (1998). Effects of parental divorce on mental health throughout the life course. American Sociological Review, 63, 239-249.[CrossRef]
  • Cherlin, A. J., & Furstenberg, F. F. (1994). Stepfamilies in the US: A reconsideration. Annual Review of Sociology, 20, 359-381.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Cicirelli, V. G. (1995). Sibling relationships across the life span. New York: Plenum Press.
  • Coenen-Huther, J., Kellerhals, J., von Allmen, M., Hagman, H.-M., Jeannerat, F., & Widmer, E. D. (1994). Les réseaux de solidarités dans la famille. [Family solidarity networks.] Lausanne: Réalités Sociales.
  • Coleman, J. (1988). Social capital and the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-121.
  • Coleman, M., & Ganong, L. H. (1990). Remarriage and stepfamily research in the 1980s: Increased interest in an old family form. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 925-940.[CrossRef]
  • Coleman, M., Ganong, L. H., & Cable, S. M. (1997). Beliefs about women’s intergenerational family obligations to provide support before and after divorce and remarriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 165-176.
  • D’Andrade, R. (1995). The Development of Cognitive Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Elias, N. (1978). What is Sociology? London: Hutchinson.
  • Ellingson, L. L., & Sotirin, P. J. (2006). Exploring young adults’ perspectives on communication with aunts. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23, 483-501.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • European Council Research. (2003). Demographic yearbook 2003. Strasbourg: Author.
  • Everitt, B. S. (1993). Cluster analysis. New York: Edward Arnold.
  • Fehr, B., & Perlman, D. (1985). The family as a social network and support system. In L. L’Abate (Ed.), The handbook of family psychology and therapy (pp. 323-356). Homewood, IL: The Dorsey Press.
  • Ferri, E. (1984). Stepchildren: A national study. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities.
  • Firth, R., Hubert, J., & Forge, A. (1970). Families and their relatives. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Fischer, L. R. (1983). Mothers and mothers-in-law. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 187-192.[CrossRef]
  • Furstenberg, F. F. (1990). Divorce and the American family. Annual Review of Sociology, 16, 379-403.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Furstenberg, F. F., & Hughes, M. E. (1995). Social capital and successful development among at-risk youth. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 580-592.[CrossRef]
  • Furstenberg, F. F., & Kaplan, S. B. (2004). Social capital and the family. In M. Richards, J. Scott & J. Treas (Eds.), Blackwell companion to the sociology of families (pp. 218-232). London: Blackwell.
  • Ganong, L. H., & Coleman, M. (2004). Stepfamily relationships: Development, dynamics, and interventions. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
  • Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.[CrossRef]
  • Hobart, C. (1987). Parent-child relations in remarried families. Journal of Family Issues, 3, 259-277.
  • Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
  • Johnson, M. J., & Milardo, R. M. (1984). Network interference in pair relationships: A social psychological recasting of Slater’s theory of social regression. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 46, 893-899.[CrossRef]
  • Krackhardt, D. (1987). Cognitive social structures. Social Networks, 9, 109-134.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Lebart, L., & Mirkin, B. (1993). Correspondance analysis and classification. In C. M. Cuadras & C. M. Rao (Eds.), Multivariate analysis: Future directions (pp. 341-357). Amsterdam: North Holland.
  • Lebart, L., Morineau, A., & Piron, M. (1997). Statistique exploratoire multidimensionnelle. [Multidimensional exploratory statistics.] Paris: Dunod.
  • Levin, I. (1993). Family as mapped realities. Journal of Family Issues, 14, 82-91.[Abstract]
  • Levin, I., & Trost, J. (1992). Understanding the concept of family. Family Relations, 41, 348-351.[CrossRef]
  • Parsons, T. (1949). The social structure of the family. In R. N. Anshen (Ed.), The family: Its function and destiny (pp. 173-201). New York: Harper and Brothers.
  • Pasley, K. (1987). Family boundary ambiguity: Perceptions of adult stepfamily family members. In K. Pasley & M. Ihinger-Tallman (Eds.), Remarriage and stepparenting: Current research and theory (pp. 206-225). New York: Guilford.
  • Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1-24.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Portes, A. (2000). The two meanings of social capital. Sociological Forum, 15, 1-11.
  • Pyke, K. D., & Bengston, V. (1996). Caring more or less: Individualistic and collectivist systems of family eldercare. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 379-392.[CrossRef]
  • Ruggles S. (1996). The effects of demographic change on multigenerational family structure: Unite States Whites, 1880-1980. In A. Bideau, A. Perrenoud, K. A. Lynch, & G. Brunet (Eds.), Les systèmes démographiques du passé (pp. 21-40). Lyon: Programme Rhône-Alpes de Recherches en Sciences Humaines.
  • Scanzoni, J., & Marsiglio, W. (1991). Wider families as primary groups. Marriage and Family Review, 17, 117-133.[CrossRef]
  • Schneider, D. M. (1980). American kinship: A cultural account. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Stein, C. H., Bush, E. G., Ross, R. R., & Ward, M. (1992). Mine, yours and ours: A configural analysis of the networks of married couples in relation to marital satisfaction and individual well-being. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9, 365-383.[Abstract]
  • Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (1996). Using multivariate statistics. New York: HarperCollins.
  • Trost, J. (1993). Family from a dyadic perspective. Journal of Family Issues, 14, 92-104.[Abstract]
  • Velicer, W. F., & Fava, J. (1998). Effects of variable and subject sampling on factor pattern recovery. Psychological Methods, 3, 231-251.
  • Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Weeks, J., Heaphy B., & Donovam, C. (2004). The lesbian and gay family. In M. Richards, J. Scott, & J. Treas (Eds.), Blackwell companion to the sociology of families, pp. 340-355. London: Blackwell.
  • Weston, K. (1997). Families we choose: Lesbian, gays, kinship. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Widmer, E. D. (1999a). Family contexts as cognitive networks: A structural approach of family relationships. Personal Relationships, 6, 487-503.[CrossRef]
  • Widmer, E. D. (1999b). Les relations fraternelles des adolescents. [Sibling relationships of adolescents.] Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
  • Widmer, E. D. (2004). Couples and their networks. In M. Richards, J. Scott, & J. Treas (Eds.), Blackwell companion to the sociology of families (pp. 356-373). London: Blackwell.
  • Widmer, E. D., Kellerhals, J., & Levy, R. (2004). Types of conjugal networks, conjugal conflict and conjugal quality. European Sociological Review, 20, 63-77.[Abstract]
  • Widmer, E. D., & La Farga, L.-A. (2000). Family networks: A sociometric method to study relationships in families. Field Methods, 12, 108-128.[Abstract]
  • Widmer, E. D., Legoff, J.-M., Hammer, R., Kellerhals, J., & Levy, R. (2006). Embedded Parenting? The influence of conjugal networks on parent-child relationships. Journal of Personal and Social Relationships, 23, 387-306.
  • Wilson, P., & Pahl, R. (1988). The changing sociological construct of the family. Sociological Review, 36, 233-266.
  • Yi, E. K. (1986). Implications of conjugal role segregation for extramarital relationships: A network model. Social Networks, 8, 119-147.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Widmer, E. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?