This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Boesch, R. P. Articles by Wright, T. L. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Relationship satisfaction and commitment in long-term male couples: Individual and dyadic effects

Catholic University of America

Renata Cerqueira

Catholic University of America

Martin A. Safer

Catholic University of America, Safer{at}cua.edu

Thomas L. Wright

Catholic University of America

Male couples (N = 53) described their relationship history during an oral history interview, and partners also provided individual self-reports about relationship satisfaction, commitment, and quality. Although couple members were similar in satisfaction levels, they differed in commitment levels. An individual's expression of positive and negative emotions during the interview predicted both his own and his partner's current satisfaction, but predicted only his partner's satisfaction four years later. Furthermore, current and future relationship satisfaction was predicted not just by one's own, but also by one's partner's, perception of equality and attachment. In contrast, current and future commitment was predicted only by one's own perception of equality and attachment. Thus, predictors of satisfaction were both personal and interpersonal, but predictors of commitment were only personal. Separable individual- and dyadic-level processes underlie intimate relationships.

Key Words: negative emotions • oral history interview • perceived attachment • perceived equality • positive emotions • relationship commitment

References

• Boesch, R.P. (2001). External validation of oral history correlates of relationship satisfaction (Doctoral dissertation, Catholic University of America , 2001). Dissertation Abstracts International, 62, 1066 .
• Buehlman, K.T. & Gottman, J. (1996). The oral history interview and the oral history coding system. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Buehlman, K.T., Gottman, J.M., & Katz, L.F. (1992). How a couple views their past predicts their future: Predicting divorce from an oral history interview . Journal of Family Psychology, 5, 295—318.[CrossRef]
• Carrère, S., Buehlman, K.T., Gottman, J.M., Coan, J.A., & Ruckstuhl, L. (2000). Predicting marital stability and divorce in newlywed couples . Journal of Family Psychology, 14, 42—58.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Cerqueira, R. (2003). Correlates of relationship satisfaction in long-term same-sex male couples. Unpublished manuscript.
• Cochran, S.D., & Peplau, L.A. (1985). Value orientation in heterosexual relationships . Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9, 477—488.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Duffy, S.M., & Rusbult, C.E. (1986). Satisfaction and commitment in homosexual and heterosexual relationships . Journal of Homosexuality, 12, 1—23.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Gonzalez, R., & Griffin, D. (2000). On the statistics of interdependence: Treating dyadic data with respect. In W. Ickes & S. Duck (Eds.), The social psychology of personal relationships (pp. 181—213). Chichester: Wiley.
• Gottman, J.M. (1994). What predicts divorce? The relationship between marital processes and marital outcomes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Gottman, J.M., & Levenson, R.W. (1999). How stable is marital interaction over time? Family Process, 38, 159—165.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Gottman, J.M., Levenson, R.W., Gross, J., Fredrickson, B.L., McCoy, K., Rosenthal, L., Reuf, A., & Yoshimoto, D. (2003). Correlates of gay and lesbian couples' relationship satisfaction and relationship dissolution . Journal of Homosexuality, 45, 23—43.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Gottman, J.M., Levenson, R.W., Swanson, C., Swanson, K., Tyson, R., Yoshimoto, D. (2003). Observing gay, lesbian, and heterosexual couples' relationships: Mathematical modeling of conflict interaction . Journal of Homosexuality, 45, 65—91.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Gottman, J.M., & Notarius, C.I. (2000). Decade review: Observing marital interaction . Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 927—947.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Griffin, D., & Gonzalez, R. (1995). Correlational analysis of dyad-level data in the exchangeable case . Psychological Bulletin, 118, 430—439.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Haas, S.M., & Stafford, L. (1998). An initial examination of maintenance behaviors in gay and lesbian relationships . Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 846—855.[Abstract]
• Hawkins, M., Carrère, S., & Gottman, J.M. (2002). Marital sentiment override: Does it influence couples' perceptions? Journal of Marriage and the Family, 64, 193—201.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Herek, G.M. (2006). Legal recognition of same-sex relationships in the United States . American Psychologist, 61, 607—621.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Kurdek, L.A. (1992). Dimensionality of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale: Evidence from heterosexual and homosexual couples . Journal of Family Psychology, 6, 22—35.[CrossRef]
• Kurdek, L.A. (1995). Developmental changes in relationship quality in gay and lesbian cohabiting couples . Developmental Psychology, 31, 86—94.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Kurdek, L.A. (1998). Relationship outcomes and their predictors: Longitudinal evidence from heterosexual married, gay cohabiting, and lesbian cohabiting couples . Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 553—568.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Kurdek, L.A. (2004). Are gay and lesbian cohabiting couples really different from heterosexual married couples? Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 880—900.[CrossRef]
• Kurdek, L.A. (2005). What do we know about gay and lesbian couples? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 251—254.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Le, B., & Agnew, C.R. (2003). Commitment and its theorized determinants: A meta-analysis of the investment model . Personal Relationships, 10, 37—57.[CrossRef]
• Maxwell, S.E. (2000). Sample size and multiple regression analysis . Psychological Methods, 5, 434—458.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Spanier, G.B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment . Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15—28.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Sternberg, R.J. (1988). Triangulating love. In R. J. Sternberg & M. L. Barnes (Eds.), The psychology of love (pp. 119—138). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Vol. 24, No. 6, 837-853 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0265407507084186


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Boesch, R. P. Articles by Wright, T. L. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?