This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Yancey, G. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Homogamy over the net: Using internet advertisements to discover who interracially dates

University of North Texas, gyancey{at}unt.edu

There is relatively scant research on who interracially dates. The propensity to interracially date may be linked to symbolic racism. It is possible that political conservatives and the highly religious have symbolically racist notions inhibiting their willingness to interracially date. The primary purpose of this research is to discover who is willing to interracially date with an emphasis upon possible religious and political factors. A national sample of internet personal advertisements indicate that political conservatism is inversely related to willingness to date regardless of race or to date Blacks while religiosity, after proper controls, is inversely related to willingness to interracially date at all. There is evidence that political ideology and religiosity both effect interracial dating but in different ways.

Key Words: exogamy • homogamy • internet personals • interracial dating • interracial relationships • racial endogamy • religious right

References

• Allport, G. (1958). The nature of prejudice. New York: Anchor
• Bogardus, E.S. (1968). Comparing racial distances in Ethiopia, South Africa, and the United States . Sociology and Social Research, 52, 149—156.[Web of Science]
• Brown, R.M. (2002). For a Christian America: A history of the religious right. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
• Campos, L. d. S., Otta E., & Siqueira, J.O. (2002). Sex Differences in mate selection strategies: Content analyses and responses to personal advertisements in Brazil . Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 395—406.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Case, C.E., Greeley, A.M., & Fuchs S. (1989). Social determinants of racial prejudice . Sociological Perspectives, 32, 469—483[Web of Science]
• Cready, C., & Saenz, R. (1997). The nonmetro/metro context of racial/ethnic outmarriage: Some differences between African American and Mexican Americans . Rural Sociology, 62, 335—362.[Web of Science]
• Crowder, K.D., & Tolnay S.E. (2000). A new marriage squeeze for black women: The role of racial intermarriage by black men . Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 792—807.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and danger: An analysis of the concepts of pollution and taboo. New York: Ark Paperback.
• Fang C.Y., Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1998). Romance across the social status continuum: Interracial marriage and the ideological asymmetry effect . Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 290—305.[Abstract]
• Farley, R., Steeh, C., Kryson, M., Jackson, T., & Reeves, K. (1994). Stereotypes and segregation: Neighborhoods in the Detroit area . American Journal of Sociology, 100, 750—780.[CrossRef]
• Ferber, A.L. (1998). White man falling: Race, gender and white supremacy. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
• Fujino, D.C. (1997). The rates, patterns and reasons for framing heterosexual interracial dating relationships among Asian Americans . Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14, 809—828.[Abstract]
• Gallagher, C. (2003). The multiracial movement: The politics of color . New York: State University of New York.
• Gordon, M.M. (1964). Assimilation in American life. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Gorsuch, R.L., & Aleshire, D. (1974). Christian faith and ethnic prejudice: A review and interpretation of research . Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, September, 281—307.
• Hall, P. (2000). The Bible prohibits interracial marriage. In B. J. Grapes (Ed.), Interracial relationships (pp. 34—38). San Diego, CA: Greenhaven Press.
• Harris, T.M., & Kalbfleisch, P.J. (2000). Interracial dating: The implications of race for initiating a romantic relationship . The Howard Journal of Communications, 22, 49—64.
• Jorgenson, D.E., & Jorgenson, C.B. (1992). Age and white racial attitudes: National surveys, 1972—1989 . Sociological Spectrum, 12, 21—34.[Web of Science]
• Kalmijn, M. (1991). Status homogamy in the United States . American Journal of Sociology, 97, 496—523.[CrossRef]
• Kinder, D.R., & Sanders, L.M. (1996). Divided by color: Racial politics and democratic ideals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Kirkpatrick, L.A. (1993). Fundamentalism, Christian orthodoxy, and intrinsic religious orientation as predictors of discriminatory attitudes . Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, March, 256—268.
• Lewis, R., & Yancey, G. (1995). Bi-racial marriages in the United States: An analysis of variation in family member support of the decision to marry . Sociological Spectrum, 15, 443—462.[Web of Science]
• Lynn, M.W., & Bolig R. (1985). Personal advertisements: Sources of data about relationships . Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2, 377—383.[Abstract]
• Martin, W. (2005). With God on our side: The rise of the religious right in America. New York : Broadway .
• Montini, T., & Ovrebro, B. (1990). Personal relationship ads: An informal balancing act . Sociological Perspectives, 33, 327—339.[Web of Science]
• Myrdal, G. (1964). An American dilemma. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Orr, A. (2004). Meeting, Mating, and Cheating: Sex, Love, and the New World of Online Dating. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
• Pawlowski, B., & Koziel, S. (2002). The impact of traits offered in personal advertisements on response rates. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 139—149.[CrossRef]
• Phua, V.C., & Kaufman, G. (2003). The Crossroads of race and sexuality: Date selection among men in internet "personal" ads . Journal of Family Issues, 24, 981—994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Qian, Z. (1997). Breaking the Racial barriers: Variations in interracial marriage between 1980 and 1990 . Demography, 34, 263—276.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Roberts, K.A. (2004). Religion in sociological perspective. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/ Thomson .
• Sautter J., Tippett, B., & Morgan, S.P. (2006). Check out my profile: Demographic characteristics of the internet dating population . Paper presented at Southern Sociological Society Meetings, New Orleans, LA.
• Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., & Bobo, L. (1996). Racism, conservatism, affirmative action, and intellectual sophistication: A matter of principled conservatism or group dominance . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 476—490.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Small, D.H. (1959). Christian design for marriage. Old Tappan, NJ: Fleming H. Revell.
• Sniderman, P., & Tetlock, P.E. (1986). Symbolic racism: Problems of motive attribution in political analysis . Journal of Social Issues, 42, 129—150.[Web of Science]
• Spickard, P. (1989). Mixed blood: Intermarriage and ethnic identity in twentieth-century America. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
• Todd, J., McKinney, J.L., Harris, R., Chadderton, R., & Small L. (1992). Attitudes toward interracial dating: Effects of age, sex and race . Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 20, 202—208.
• Tucker, M.B., & Mitchell-Kernan, C. (1990). New trends in black American interracial marriage: the social structural context . Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 209—218.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Turner, H.A., & Turner, R.J. (1999). Gender, social status, and emotional reliance . Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 40, 360—373.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Wilcox, C. (2000). Onward Christian soldiers? The religious right in American politics. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
• Winship, C., & Radbill, L. (1994). Sampling weights and regression analysis . Sociological Methods and Research, 23, 230—257.[CrossRef]
• Yancey, G. (2002). Who interracially dates: An examination of the characteristics of those who have interracially dated . Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 33, 179—190.[Web of Science]
• Yancey, G., & Yancey, S. (1997). Black—white differences in the use of personal advertisements for individuals seeking interracial relationships . Journal of Black Studies, 27, 650—667.[Web of Science]
• Yancey, G., & Yancey, S. (1998). Interracial dating: Evidence from the personal advertisements . Journal of Family Issues, 19, 334—348.[Abstract]

Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Vol. 24, No. 6, 913-930 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0265407507084190


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. W. Eastwick, J. A. Richeson, D. Son, and E. J. Finkel Is Love Colorblind? Political Orientation and Interracial Romantic Desire Pers Soc Psychol Bull, September 1, 2009; 35(9): 1258 - 1268. [Abstract] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Yancey, G. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?